first scene
an impressively big structure that was an assembly or
gathering area
it was also a launch area
it looked to be 4 to 8 square kilometres
it had a skeletal look to it, as though it was made of girders
there were small and large groups on every part of it
second scene
it was the beginning of a week-end or a week long activity
every group was preparing, and discussing how to maintain
motion that could be sustained indefinitely in a qualitative
way
i listened to the reasoning of several different groups
the predominant theme was mathematical
it was agreed by all that it had to be done in a straight line
third scene
one group thought that the best way to sustain motion was to
have an intertwining, in the same way a rope is made or how
women plait their hair, mechanism
although it could work in theory when it was tried it caused
lumps or knots in what should have been a seamless or
smooth formation
the way it was tried out was by people launching themselves
from the structure into the surrounding environment which
was in zero gravity and endless space
fourth scene
another group used the straight line action approach but had
problems because they were using a mechanism other than
love-motivated reciprocating actions
it occurred to me that initiating motions with the attitude of
just wanting to be might have merit
the dream ended without the idea being tested
interpretation/analysis
the sense of space and the intensity of the feelings associated
with the application of the various mechanisms of motion was
the stand-out features of this dream
there is difficulty in employing the roney analysis to this
dream
110 minutes
R.E.M.
.
... . .. . . . . . . ... . . . .