29th january2009

at the bottom of every murder there is a death outcome assertion or postulate

the postulate or assertion had to exist in the person in the first place

no death outcome assertion, no outcome of death

all death outcome assertions have at least two aspects

1 strength

2 structure

e.g. " jump off cliff "

each aspect is a variable

" jump off cliff "   " fly off cliff "

" jump from tree "   " fly from tree "

the strongest postulates/assertions will be able to accommodate all other lesser

postulates and assertions

e.g. the postulate "drop dead" can encompass the assertion "jump from cliff"

but not the other way around

jumping off the cliff will not necessarily result in death whereas dropping dead must

a weak assertion cannot encompass a stronger one

a man who killed in self defence does not want to share a cell with a child murderer

a child murderer does not want to share a cell with a cannibal

cannibals have to be isolated

there are at least two ways these abstract postulates/assertions become part of the person

1 inherited

2 self - instilled

all postulates reduce to a simple structured thought/sentence

death-outcome postulates/assertions can form very early on in life

any time after the brain is capable of forming structured sentences

all postulates were originally in the form of a thought

e.g. "if i had as money as i wanted i could do whatever i wanted"

and becomes, across the undulations, a simple-sentenced genetic structure forming earlier on in the life of the person every new undulation and eventually turns into a simple sentence that becomes a fixed genetic structure

e.g. "starve 'til dead"

this is a degradation-leading-to-death assertion

back to index page