death outcome assertions



capital letters = link



Start page


death-outcome assertions


a thought which has been thought so many times it takes on a form within the genetic structure


at the bottom of every Murder there is a

death-outcome postulate or assertion


death-outcome assertions have to exist in the person before an outcome of any Form of murder can occur


no death-outcome assertions within the person then no form of death-outcome realities will come from the person


  there are at least two ways these abstract assertions become part of a person


1


self-instilled


2


inherited


~


all death-outcome assertions eventually reduce to a simple-structured thought/sentence


example


"starve til dead"



death-outcome assertions take hold in the mind when the person is at their physical/mental peak (we all can probably appreciate the reason/s why such a profound decision has to take place when our mind's and bodies are at their healthiest)


in the writer's case, it was when he was seventeen


the moment is clearly remembered


i was in the company of three or four my peers


the conversation we were having isn't remembered in detail


it wasn't a heavy-duty ethical subject or anything like that


as it is recalled it was light, good-natured, to and fro Banter between young males enjoying each others company


the actual thought isn't remembered either


what is remembered is my reaction to it


my thought was "no, i don't want that"


it was undoubtedly a Stray thought


why do death-outcome assertions occur in the first place?


the unsatisfactory answer is because they can


our reality is, currently, The 3 of Pi


the reality of 3 is, inherently, finite


a finite reality which can, albeit, be experienced endlessly


listen people, if there was a reality within the confines of 3 which was wholly satisfactory to everyone we would be living it


the Lover has "been there and done that" with every variation of experience you can think of


within the context of Eternity, every set of circumstances contained within 3, no matter how desirable they will initially seem, will become Bland


it is the unrepeatably new of the inexhaustible endless which has both the quality and quantity of freshness which life craves


to achieve Straight line action all we have to do is follow the trail the Lover has laid out for us


all the hard work and the worst* is behind us


this is why ethical orientation has to be introduced into our notions of life/behaviour and it needs to be understood that it takes practice to instil this trait into our being


once a death outcome assertion has become part of a person in future Undulations they can form early on in the life of that person; any time after the brain is capable of forming structured sentences


an example of death-outcome assertions is

"starve til dead"


it is currently thought that this assertion began with the thought "if i had as much money as i wanted i could do whatever i wanted"


all death-outcome assertions have at least two aspects


1

strength


2

structure


each aspect is a variable


"drown in water"

"drown in oil"


"boil in water"

"boil in oil"


the strongest death-outcome assertions will be able to accommodate weaker death-outcome assertions but not the other way around


the assertion "drown in water" is a milder form of death than "boil in water"


equally, a weaker form of death cannot accommodate a stronger one


a man who killed in

self-defence does not want to share a cell with a

child-murderer


a child-murderer does not want to share a cell with a cannibal


cannibals have to be isolated


a death-outcome assertion does not become part of a person unless that person allows it to become part of himself or herself


~


* forget what you have thought until now This is the reason for world war 1