death-outcome assertions a thought which has been thought so many times it takes on a form within the genetic structure at the bottom of every murder there is a death-outcome postulate or assertion death-outcome assertions have to exist in the person before the outcome of murder can occur no death-outcome assertions within the person, then no form of death-outcome realities will come from the person there are at least two ways these abstract assertions become part of a person 1 self-instilled 2 inherited all death-outcome assertions eventually reduce to a simple-structured thought/sentence example "starve til dead" death-outcome assertions take hold in the mind when the person is at their physical/mental peak (we all can probably appreciate the reason/s why such a profound decision has to take place when our mind's and bodies are at their healthiest) in the writer's case death outcome assertions came to the fore when he was seventeen the moment is clearly remembered i was in the company of three or four of my peers the details of all of the conversation aren't remembered it wasn't a heavy-duty ethical subject or anything like that as it is recalled, it was light, good-natured, to and fro banter between young males enjoying each others company the actual thought isn't remembered either what is remembered is my reaction to it my thought was "no, i don't want that" it was undoubtedly a Stray thought why do death-outcome assertions occur in the first place? the unsatisfactory answer is because they can our reality is, currently, the 3 of Pi https://endic.at/pi.html the reality of 3 is inherently finite a finite reality which albeit, can be experienced endlessly listen, people, if there was a reality within the confines of 3 which are wholly satisfactory to everyone we would be living it the Lover has "been there and done that" with every variation of experience you can think of within the context of Eternity, every set of circumstances contained within 3, no matter how desirable they will initially seem, will become Bland it is the unrepeatably new of the inexhaustible endless which has both the quality and quantity of freshness which life craves to achieve Straight line action all we have to do is follow the trail the Lover has laid out for us all the hard work and the worst* is behind us this is why ethical orientation has to be introduced into our notions of life/behaviour it also needs to be understood that it takes practice to instil this trait into our being once a death outcome assertion has become part of a person they will form earlier in the life of that person, any time after the brain is capable of forming structured sentences an example of death-outcome assertions is "starve til dead" it is currently thought that this assertion began with a thought along the lines of, "if i had as much money as i wanted i could do whatever i wanted" all death-outcome assertions have at least two aspects 1 strength 2 structure each aspect is a variable "drown in water" "drown in oil" "boil in water" "boil in oil" the strongest death-outcome assertions will be able to accommodate weaker death-outcome assertions but not the other way around the assertion "drown in water" is a milder form of death than "boil in water" equally, a weaker form of death cannot accommodate a stronger one a man who killed in self-defence does not want to share a cell with a child-murderer a child-murderer does not want to share a cell with a cannibal cannibals have to be isolated a death-outcome assertion does not become part of a person unless that person allows it to become part of himself or herself * forget what you have thought until now, the reason for world war 1 is This http://www.revisionist.net/hysteria/baghdad-bahn.html