15th feb 2013 the box below this one is the original entry of the 1st april 2010 while trying to make sense of how genetic theory is structured for devolving beings it seemed most likely that the slowest regressive rate would be that of one day each undulation it also made sense to think that a rate of one day forward each undulation would also be the slowest progression of an evolving being this was the basis for the rationale of the original entry in the box below this one it was though, troubling to think that there wasn't a greater distinction between both evolving and devolving beings specifically, the fact that an evolving being has a much greater time (1^100 years) period to experience the notion that there was one day for both evolving and devolving beings simply didn't feel right when the thought, that there needed to be a clearer distinction between evolving beings and devolving beings, first occurred yesterday the only thing about the entry that could be remembered was the sentence that had the words "one day forward" in it it wasn't until it was re-read that the other points in the entry pointed to an answer to the problem of seperating the equal basis assumption it is thought that it isn't just chance that extrapolating some of the ideas of the original page overcomes the problem of making a clear distinction between evolving and devolving beings and in turn gives substance to the formulating of genetic theory it fits in perfectly with these new set of considerations! the most favoured theme of genetic theory for evolving beings is the undulationary squaring theme or is sister theme the inter undulationary squaring theme ten days not one or three makes most sense in this way... powering by ten is a less powerful function that sqauring  (three days, not one, makes a lot more sense from a squaring process point of view since 3 is as near to the day, with the option of dividing the 24 hours of a day into the exact number, in terms of hours, to achieve a precise value for the square root of ten *ten has significance since the constitution of the man shaped being contains ten (ten fingers and ten toes) and overcomes the troubling similarity of an equality between evolving beings and devolving beings) it is now thought that for this point of time of earthly evolution for the mammal class of beings it is a three day pre-halfway generation progression this in turn allows the squaring of ten to brought into the formulation     an undulation progression for an as yet unformulated number of times that is it is a squaring** of ten day increments which build up to a point where it has gathered enough of a momentum for any couple to begin the squaring process proper as per the undulationary squaring theme) so the formulation for undulationary squaring is... the pairing of a man and a woman begins*** the first thing is, of course, to get a woman and a man who are made for each other together it's both unfathomably complicated in that the consideration of collective love means that every individual who engaged in collective love (100 000 000 012) last undulation is part of the creation of a new couple and it is childishly simplistic in that there is only one way it does happen the first breakthrough came in...   *when the number ten has been reached the squaring of powering becomes expedient ** after powering a number the next most powerful function then becomes squaring (get on your calculator and see how many times you can square any number before the calculator starts grinding to a halt) ***this may be a lot more simpler than you imagine ~~~ it is known that there are "bottom line" thoughts that a person has... "am i evolving"... "can i be the person i am without having to change"... "will it make any difference to my destiny if i marry someone who drives a car"... and similar thoughts cross peoples minds the 1st july 2013 entry (although the date of the entry will stay the same it will be recognised by those of you who have read this entry as the 28th june 2013) is going to be such that there is not going to be any room left for doubt it's only fair that those who have and are making the effort to keep abreast of the writer ethically, even if it's only a few thousand or even two dozen couples world-wide, know exactly where they stand and be given every encouragement for this website to allow itself to be swayed by a majority of people who are living outside of ethical parameters is a crime against love/life in short this entry is asking for the date to implement what was asked for in page "two futures" to be brought forward by another two days of the original asking date of the 1st june 2013 if you can pull it off it will mean that there  are enough orienting people in the world to be able to arrange themselves to form the expression of a smile that could be seen from the moon you have done it and can do it

1st april 2010 the date of demarcation for progressive/regressive evolutionary/devolutionary trends is 28th june 2013 if we can introduce the necessary changes by that date it means that we are living within his terrible love and we will, by implication, eventually make his terrible love redundant interpreting the evolutionary trend in analogue terms means there is a day by day, undulation by undulation, improving factor at work a day earlier this undulation means mammal man will lose 10 000 less children this undulation, 9 999 next undulation, 9 998 the undulation after that and so on a day later means that we lose 10 000 more children this undulation and that, ultimately, it is a doom and gloom scenario it would be a mistake to interpret things to mean that a day later means that it may be on time next undulation failure to implement what's being asked for at this web site means that generation 2000 is slowly slipping into the past which is what the devolving want, whether they realize it or not if it is a quantum mechanism then it is yet to be formulated in the absence of a love-driven desire to strengthen the weak links in mamamml man's evolutionary progress the only tool available is to manipulate your healthy desire to see what the lover has looked like and offer to present the picture pages that can be presented as an incentive an artist will be needed to draw the pictures live on the internet other pictures before that... d-man... p.s. the writer would like to see the two christmas day singers from 1997/98 it will be to your advantage ladies ...back to index page . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .