16/17/18/19th/20th/21st/ august 2012 with the exception of two people known to this website (one was english; a high profile figure in acedemia who announced we would no longer be using the car and a german man who moved out of his country to a country where he could live on the world wage.) you still just don't get it not only are you not taking your responsibilities seriously but are now beginning to look elsewhere to point the finger and where better than this website this website has heard the rumblings of those who are managing to construe that what is being written herein as provoking murder and that consequently this website itself is committing murder since when has telling the truth been murder it is suggested that there are those amongst you who need to think through what it is that is wrong and right if a person writes that there are a pack of lying, murdering dogs running around who are the cause of all the major problems in the world and it is written to alert life oriented beings to the presence of the lying, murdering pack of dogs existence so that they have the ammunition, in the form of facts, with which to throw at the lying, murdering pack of dogs, and the lying, murdering pack of dogs continue lying and murdering but with less confidence and zest then what has been written has served part of its purpose it is the nature of the lying, murdering pack of dogs to counter any and every attempt to stop them being lying, murdering dogs through the use of more lying and more murdering when a lying, murdering dog sees that life oriented beings are unhappy with what they are doing and life oriented beings tell them to stop it they see it as an attack on their lifestyle if there are murders being caused because of the expose of the lying, murdering dogs then there is an exceptionally sensitive point to consider it is summed up thus... whether in a state of repentance or not a being has to experience everything they bring into existence if it can be shown that speaking the truth is causing the murder of life oriented beings then any form of expression... "it's a nice day today... that dress looks nice on you..." that contains any truth also contains the  potentiality of  murder this website says that whoever accuses a statement of truth as being harmful to life is taking a step in the direction of an inverted orientation to life this website see's murder as the natural behaviour of death oriented beings, which, as the conjugate of life/death, and like the conjugates of love/life, have a maximum and minimum range the conjugate of life/death however has a fixed maximum and minimum parameter for the conjugate of life/death the minimum is one or less second or so and the maximum is 1 ^100 years or thereabouts the conjugates of life without death also has a minimum of one second or less but is an open-ended maximum which is limited only by the self-instilled trait of love it may be the case, although it doesn't make a lot of sense,  that life oriented beings are being steered into the cul-de-sac of murder and many more will be this is the equation that is being weighed... alert beings who are still oriented to life to the dire and dreadful consequences of becoming a lying, murdering dog and in so doing bring just two life oriented beings to their senses each undulation, then those two beings will go on to become part of the function of one times one which in turn means that their genetic structure becomes sophisticated enough to give rise, in the course of eterntiy, to more man shaped beings than are alive in the world today, then what is being written here is more productive of life than it is destructive to life it can be appreciated, and it is beginning to be realized, that what is happening here and now is the most profoundly serious touch and go situation imaginable yes, the train has slowed (world war 1 is the closest the train comes to actually stopping for mammal man) but it did not stop ~~~~ the meaning of word causing has to be considered the word causing means... that which is done, with or without the intention of it producing the outcome that it produced again we're back into the moses syndrome  (The Old Testament. numbers: 15 and 15 ) which embraces the abdication of responsibility by introducing the notion that where intent was not present then no crime is committed; the car driver who committed murder didn't have the intention to commit murder tell the child before she or he is about to be killed that the person who is about to kill her or him isn't about to do anything wrong tell the parents of the child that the person who killed her or him has done nothing wrong can you see how ridiculous this whole argument is becoming the law (you know, that thing which changes with the breeze) says the car driver has done nothing wrong you can expect a £200 fine for taking the life of a child if you're found to have been driving improperly (a case that happened near where the writer lived) and get anywhere up to life imprisonment for sexually assaulting the same child £200! how you must hate life can you not see that our values as to what is right are terribly wrong perhaps you can't in which case... the writer has been saying it for the last 20 years and will no doubt be saying it through this website for the next 20 years "i'm surrounded by loonies" and "the lunatics are running the asylum" also consider this point... would you rather have your child survive the attack of someone who tried to kill her or him or dead by the hands of someone who didn't want to kill her or him this web site says if a child doesn't want to cease to exist the onus is on a person to make damn sure that whatever they do they don't take the life of a child who doesn't want to cease to exist what is more important than making sure you don't kill a child? this website maintains that the worst thing that a person can do is take the life of a child it appears that this web site is the only place in the world where this sentiment exists... see also page 57 and crime   further; a loose interpretation of the word murder allows the term murderer to be applied to the lover as it was he who brought into being those circumstances in which murder could occur the difference is that the frame of mind that didn't foresee the mistake does not apply to a car driver who knows that the possibility exists that murder can occur the car is, in some countries, already the no.1 murderer and becoming so in others as you read ten times more children are dying from car accidents than are dying in wars click the links and read if you don't believe it on a world wide basis that's a million people each year who have thrown away the chance of getting to heaven the concept of murder cannot be applied to circumstances where the chain of cause and effect are so far removed from the original cause that the accusation of murder can be levelled otherwise the lover can be held responsible for every murder that has occurred, is occurring and will occur e.g. a person doesn't go to the cinema because... the £10 ticket he would have bought would have made the receipts for the cinema for the month £10 005, instead the monthly take was for £9, 995 the management of the cinema decided three months earlier that if the takings ever fell below £10 000 for any one month they would close the picture house down the picture house closes and five people lose their jobs one of the people who lost his job went into a depression and killed his family therefore the man who didn't buy the cinema ticket was the murderer the reason the man didn't go to the pictures that night was because he was £2.50 short of the £10 he needed the reason he was £2.50 short was because his food cost £5 more than the week before the reason food had gone up in price was because there had been a drought the year before and the crops had failed and the suppliers had put up the prices the lover could have foreseen there would be years when crops would fail and so should have reduced the sexual urge to procreate by half which would have meant there would always be enough food even in those years when the crops failed which in turn means the lover is a murderer alright then... from now all over the world every family is limited to one child until the population is at the level of the current level of food production, about 6 000 000 000 people then we need to factor in the possibility that there may be a three year period when the crops fail, which means 2 000 000 000 people in fact let's go the whole hog and play it really safe, the population should never exceed the amount of food that can be stored to accommodate a ten year span of failed crops, 180 000 000 we had better take into account that there may be a pestilence plague that coincides with a drought so better be safe than sorry and reduce the total maximum population to 100 000 000 then there's the possibility... within the human condition the definition of murder should not contain the expectation that an average person should have to consider the consequences of any action they initiate beyond the first few instances of anything they do (the first, second and third instance) now the definition of murder is... causing, directly or indirectly, with or without intent beyond the first, second or third instance in the chain of cause and effect, a pre-pubescent person to fail to become a parent this response is becoming altogether too complicated and long-winded instead of life becoming easier to understand and live it is getting cumbersome it is the case that, given the right environment, a life oriented child-teenager-adult will go through life without having to consider these points and will never fall foul of the laws of love/life (our reality)